the satire.

Perhaps when one holds everything in contempt , the very act takes the shape of revenge, as Ben Parker’s wife, Amy Parker would say , " it takes over." The superciliousness of “a revenge” doesnot quite come from the confidence which compels one to take “one” but from the condescension of an inexplicable motive , intangible to to one and all, that 'motive' doesnot comply to most of the things which run in strict accordance with the conventions. Rebuttal of such a convention triggers a gargantuan outburst of violent indignation. Expecting least from the “less”..such is the flamboyance of “anger” and you say the brazen attitude of “the blatant” is unfederal?!

the candid categories :)

"Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself. "

by leo tolstoy

Definitely being outspoken is not liked by many specially none assumes so much authority in our democratic country to “speak” or to express which definitely becomes an element of utmost resentment for how can one not understand that the world has a quater of zealots and a three quaters of the planet are filled with people like doubting thomas.Afterall none likes the “bare faced truth” unlike a “lie”. Truth is seldom “entertained” for it becomes a question like how can you stay so peaceful even after knowing the truth when the reverse should have been .... The same reason for which Howard Roak was railed against , for most of his deeds. No wonder we have a quasi federal system of constitution?! No, that applies to everything that the pseudointellectuals try to do where jealousy is manifested in the most imperceptible form and bounces from person to another but never really lost in the process, sounds like the first law of thermodynamics right?! Right you are monsieur! The preposterity of such an element continues to dumbfound many when you just keep on asking a question , “why” notwithstanding that there is no end to it.